Argentina Withdraws from WHO: Milei Challenges Global Health Authority In a bold move echoing former U.S. President Donald Trump, Argentine President Javier Milei has instructed Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to withdraw Argentina from the World Health Organization (WHO) . The decision, announced by presidential spokesman Manuel Adorni, stems from Milei’s deep opposition to the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, which he believes was guided by political influence rather than science. The Argentine government’s official statement criticized the WHO for what it described as a failure in its “ greatest litmus test ” during the pandemic. According to the administration, the organization promoted extended quarantines without solid scientific backing, imposed measures that undermined national sovereignty, and remained resistant to acknowledging mistakes. Milei further accused the WHO of acting as the "executing arm" of a global experiment in social control, referencing Article 7.k Reinforcing his stance, Milei took to X to celebrate the decision, posting: Nunca nos olvidaremos que fueron los ideólogos de la cuarentena cavernícola que implicó, acorde al Estatuto de Roma de 1998 (artículo 7.k) cometer, en complicidad con todos los Estados que tomaron sus directivas, uno de los delitos de lesa humanidad más estrafalarios de la historia. We will never forget that they were the ideologues of the caveman quarantine, which, according to the Rome Statute of 1998 (Article 7.k), led to one of the most bizarre crimes against humanity in history, in The post was accompanied by a video featuring clips of Milei’s interviews and speeches, further emphasizing his belief that the WHO's policies represented an unprecedented overreach into national governance. Adorni reinforced the government's stance by asserting that Argentina’s exit from the WHO would not negatively impact its health system, as the country does not currently rely on WHO funding . Instead, the administration argues that this move will allow for greater flexibility in shaping national health policies without interference from international bodies. He emphasized that Argentina’s health decisions should be made exclusively by Argentines, without external influence. The decision places Argentina alongside Trump’s United States , which had previously announced a WHO withdrawal under similar justifications. However, the WHO, a specialized agency of the United Nations, continues to play a critical role in global health, coordinating responses to pandemics, advancing medical research, and supporting health systems worldwide. Despite its influence, the organization has faced significant criticism for its handling of COVID-19, including delays in declaring the Milei’s move signals a significant shift in Argentina’s international positioning, aligning it more closely with populist, nationalist leaders who challenge global institutions . His rhetoric, branding the WHO as “nefarious” and rejecting its authority, underscores his broader agenda of reducing Argentina’s reliance on supranational organizations. The withdrawal is not merely a bureaucratic decision but a statement about sovereignty, governance, and the role of international institutions in As Argentina moves forward with its departure, the impact on the country's healthcare landscape remains to be seen. While the government insists this will strengthen national decision-making, critics worry about potential isolation from global health initiatives. Whether this is a strategic assertion of independence or a risky gamble with long-term consequences will become clear in the years ahead.
